Grey-zone friction over fisheries and maritime access currently poses the greatest risk of escalation in the South China Sea. Southeast Asian states should prioritise technology-enabled, issue-specific maritime governance and selectively partner with non-escalatory external actors, like the European Union (EU), to strengthen surveillance and enforcement capacity without attempting to resolve sovereignty disputes.

If you’ve followed headlines about artificial intelligence, you’ve probably heard the neat, worrying story: the U.S. and China are racing for AI supremacy - America’s model is freewheeling private innovation, China’s is a tightly controlled state plan. It’s a compelling story, but incomplete. New research by Lin Zhu, Wilson Wong, Alfred M. Wu (Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy), and Minqiang Zhu uncovers a surprising twist: while national governments head in opposite directions, local governments in both countries are converging on strikingly similar solutions. That convergence could open quieter, more practical channels for cooperation—right beneath the grand geopolitical drama.

Southeast Asia navigates US-China tensions, balancing economic ties and security strategies to sustain regional stability amid evolving geopolitical shifts.

The South China Sea dispute has caused much political tension. Learn about the complex controversy and how it could further strain global relations.