More than ever, futures research is needed to support people’s critical understanding of the challenges we face in the 21st century, and support the development of actionable responses through public policy and social innovation.
The field of futures research has evolved since the 1950s through different stages: a linear / predictive modality, systems thinking and the birth of alternative futures, critical futures studies, and participatory and action oriented approaches. The
key issues in applying futures studies include the need for depth exploration, links with effective communications strategies, and the actionability of foresight through policy development and social innovation.
The age of ad hoc and naïve long-term thinking is over. While humanity stumbled through the 20th century, through two catastrophic World Wars and a Cold War that led us to the brink of annihilation, and experienced unbridled industrialisation with profound
ecological impacts, we will not have such wriggle room in the 21st century. The megacrises we face now require us to proactively identify and address a myriad of emerging issues using rigourous futures research, empowering and inspiring proactive anticipatory
policy development at every level.
The need for rigour and credibility arises from the inherent slipperiness of the future as a domain of inquiry, too often exploited by quacks with either grandiose claims which pander to bias or predictions that leave people with a false sense of certainty.
Credible futures research does not carry the pretences of iron-clad certainty, but through analysis reveals the potential implications of social and ecological change, and what public policy responses (and flexibility) this demands from us in the present.
The megacrises we face now require us to proactively identify and address a myriad of emerging issues using rigourous futures research, empowering and inspiring proactive anticipatory policy development at every level.
By anticipating emerging issues, we can proactively address emerging issues rather than become the proverbial “boiled frog”. Arguably, a host of “frogs” is already in the pot, either simmering away or already at full boil. We are tackling a host of issues
such as climate change, sustainable food production, water management and equity, peak oil, and population growth, to digital surveillance / souveilance, nano-medicine, life extension, neuro-enhancement and designer-human technologies, robotics, alternative
currencies, peer to peer production, augmented reality and intelligent cities, runaway financialisation, globalisation driven social strategification, urbanisation and slums, threats to indigenous cultures, virtual education, potential technological
singularities (e.g. artificial intelligence), militarisation of space, super-power re-alignment and regionalisation, shifting expectations for political expression and finally, the urgent need to understand and care for the many aspects of our global
commons.
Futures research can help. People need grounded yet inspiring visions of sustainable and empowering futures in every aspect of life, to motivate and empower change, and counter the paralysis and escapism caused by fatalism. Futures research can help us
to leap creatively toward proactively addressing our challenges. If our guiding visions in the 20th century revolved around industrial and technological advancement, 21st century visions must also include and emphasise ecological, cultural, aesthetic
and spiritual / moral development.
A futures research synopsis
Visionaries, prophets and Cassandras have been with us from the beginning. Systematic futures research, however, is only approximately 60 years old.
In the post WWII context, the emphasis on planned development in both Western, excolonial and socialist states drove the development of new research tools, for example trend extrapolation and statistical modeling. Future-oriented research began through
the disciplines of planning, statistics, econometrics and the policy sciences. Generally speaking, futures research in this period assumed the future could be predicted based on existing trends and the application of institutional policy mechanisms.
The next stage in futures research, based on systems thinking, emerged in the early 1970s. The limitations of forecasting-as-predication, and an appreciation of the complex interactions between multiple trends / variables in a system began to emerge.
Trends could no longer be naively extrapolated into the future, what about their interactions? Drawing on pioneers in systems dynamics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) such as Jay Forrester, the Club of Rome produced their groundbreaking
study, the Limits to Growth, which was followed by a host of other systems modeling efforts, which revealed alternative development paths. New distinctions emerged, for example the difference between probable, possible and normative (preferred) futures,
wildcard (low probability but high impact) events, and a new acknowledgement of the human capacity to envision and create change. With scenario building as an important new tool “the future” became the plural “futures”.
The next stage in futures research, termed “critical futures studies” emerged in the mid 1980s. This incorporated how perspectives condition and frame futures research. Futures research is fundamentally skewed if it ignores how language and discourse
frame an issue. Research on global futures by the RAND corporation differs from the Tellus Institute, not by a matter of degees but by a matter of discourse. What is rational and valuable from one vantage point may be insane (or inane) from another.
And, power permeates our visions, images and articulations of the future. The vision for large scale industrial modernisation had led development efforts, but who or what have been left out of this image of the future? Critical futures encourages us
to ask: ‘Who is written out of the future?’ Women, children, community, the poor, indigenous people? And how can they be written back in?
Ivana Milojevic, for examples, argues that because futures research is dominated by men (as has been the history of the field of planning), futures research outcomes and strategies have reflected broadly what are considered men’s interests: technology,
economic growth, innovation. A feminised futures research would be more broadly geared toward community, child care, education and relationships. As futures research may be gender- biased, it may also have cultural, ideological and discursive blind
spots. How then do we reflect on and break out of the limitations of our perspectives? Sohail Inayatullah created the tool, Causal Layered Analysis, to explore how unexamined discourses, worldviews, ideologies, myths and metaphors underpin conceptions
of we hold about the future, and to provide a way to discover alternative vantage points that lead to alternative futures.
Finally and most recently, from the mid 1990s, the field has developed participatory and action-oriented approaches, strengthening its capacity to engage a wide variety of stakeholders from across various parts of a social system to create common ground
and common vision, and enable actionable outcomes for policy development. Many call this actionable and organisationally embedded style of futures research ‘strategic foresight’.
These four levels in the development of futures studies and research are not mutually exclusive, but rather integral to the continuing maturation of the field. A holistic approach incorporates each of them depending on the contextual requirements of the
research and public policy development requirements.
Using futures research for empowerment
There are a variety of ways to employ futures research. However I’d like to highlight three key aspects: exploration, communication and action, all of which require well developed strategies.
Exploration in futures studies means expanding our awareness in relation to an issue. This requires environmental scanning to explore signs of change and innovation (via emerging issues analysis). As William Gibson’s infamously quipped, “The future is
already here—it’s just not very evenly distributed.” Exploration implies both breadth and depth, deepening our awareness of how our perspectives shape our research, and developing alternative futures via scenarios.
Communication in futures studies is critical. In a classic sense this means knowing how to frame futures research for a particular audience to have maximum impact, for example drawing on Lakoff’s cognitive linguistics. In an educational setting it can
mean giving students the tools of critical media literacy, to enable our youth to critically examine popular images or narratives of the future which may be fatalistic and energy-sapping; or like futurist David Wright, to teach students to create media
about the future, using the tools of the social media revolution. It also means developing communications platforms that allow groups to harness their collective intelligence in thinking about futures, an example being the Institute for the Future’s
“Foresight Engine”, a massive, multiplayer online scenario gaming system.
Action in futures studies means linking an organisation’s or community’s vision with its strategies and day-to-day work. Re-freshed visions for inspiring futures need to be linked with viable strategies, social innovation and action. Futures research
needs to be concretely linked with policy development and social innovation, such that deepened strategic understanding and envigorated vision become resources for how we live in the present. Finally, action also means embodying our preferred futures
by following Gandhi’s dictum to “be the change we want to see”.
Today, more than ever, we need empowering approaches to our global and local futures. Futures research offers some approaches that, in tandem with other disciplines and perspectives, help us address our world’s challenges. Futures research forms an important
ingredient in the recipe for empowering people in the present to create inspiring futures in many aspects of life. We are fortunate that there are many graduate programmes and a wide variety of talent at work across the globe working in this field.
As a futures researcher, I would like to express my gratitude to the National University of Singapore and the Singapore Government (National Security Coordination Secretariat) for this opportunity to bring futures research into the Lee Kuan Yew School
of Public Policy. It is not a promise or guarantee, but with a bit of love and care, from little seeds come the alternative futures we seek.
José Maria Ramos is a Visiting Professor at the LKY School. His email is jose@actionforesight.net